IS ISLAM A RELIGION OF
PEACE?
On the one hand, I could say that the answer to this question is
quite simple. Just compare Jesus to
Muhammad…
Jesus never harmed anyone or anything. As Isaiah describes the Messiah “A bruised reed He will not break and a dimly
burning wi9ck He will not extinguish;” (Isaiah 42:3)
Muhammad conducted war, beheaded captives, raided caravans, and
added captured women to his harem.
Jesus’ immediate followers, likewise, were harmless. They spread the message of the Gospel of the
Messiah through reasoning and arguments of persuasion.
Muhammad’s successors conducted war, beheaded captives, raided
caravans, and added captured women to their harems.
The answer is relatively straight forward. There is nothing about the life of Muhammad
that would even remotely suggest that he was a man of peace or that the
“religion” that he founded is one of peace.
One may also look to the Quran and the Hadiths to confirm a
general call to violence on the part of Islam.
The Muslim apologist cries fowl, however. “How can you claim that the Bible is a book of peace when in fact, it also called for not only violence, but genocide?" Furthermore "How can you say that the Bible is a book of peace when it declares that there will be violence in the future?"
Most Christians tend to avoid these objections. Personally, I’m skeptical that anyone who
would present these objections is really interested in determining truth and/or
is so entrenched in Islam that He would be unwilling to objectively reevaluate
his own faith anyway. I hope that such
is not the case and with that in mind, I present as my intention, to address
these objections and demonstrate that they are fundamentally unfounded. In this essay, I will attempt to address the
former objection and in a subsequent essay, I will address the latter
objection.
Why the call in the Bible
to genocide?
The
Muslim apologist is correct when he makes the claim that God told Moses that
when the Children of Israel were to enter the Land of Canaan there were to
completely kill all the people of the land.
Clearly, in Deuteronomy 17:16-18 it says
Only in the cities of
these peoples that the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall
not leave alive anything that breathes.
But you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittite and the Amorite, the
Canaanite and the Perizzite, the Hivite and the Jebusite, as the Lord your God
has commanded you, so that they may not teach you to do according to all their detestable
things which they have done for their gods, so that you would sin against the
Lord your God.
This is
a reality. This is a part of the very
ugly, down and dirty truth that is found in the Bible. But it is a necessary part of the Bible
narrative. So, I rhetorically ask “Why
did God command the Children of Israel to do something as utterly cruel as
annihilating the inhabitants of the Land?
I will attempt to answer this, first, by addressing the nature of the
people who were in the land, second, by addressing the purposes behind God
wanting the Children of Israel to occupy the land and last, by the nature of
the warfare that was used in taking the land.
A.
The nature of the people
who were living in the land.
The
first hint that we get about the nature of the people who were living in the
land is found in Genesis 15. It tells
something about, not only the people, but something very wonderful about
God. In Genesis 15, God makes a covenant
with Abram (whose name would be changed to Abraham). As part of the covenant God says to him
“Know for certain that
your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, where they
will be enslaved and oppressed four hundred years. But I will also judge the nation whom they
will serve, and afterward they will come out with many possessions. As for you, you shall go to your fathers in
peace; you will be buried at a good old age.
Then in the fourth generation they will return here, for the iniquity of the Amorite is not yet
complete.
(Genesis 15:13-16)
Here we
see God telling Abraham that his descendants would spend 400 years in
Egypt. The Amorites who were in the land
at the time of Abraham’s dwelling there were deeply involved in idolatry and
all sorts of perverse behavior. But the
sin among them had not yet reached its peak.
They were not beyond redemption.
The 400 years of the descendants of Abraham dwelling in Egypt was the
time necessary for the Amorites to reach their peak of corruption. Here’s where we see something wonderful and
compassionate about God. Notice His
patience. He knew that the Amorites
would get worse and worse. He just
didn’t want to utterly destroy them then and there. Some of the Amorites at the time of Abraham
were redeemable and not deserving of death.
The compassion of God is reflected by the fact that He also wanted to
give them time to repent.
I will
not, at this point, get into the other aspects of this covenant. They are very significant. But they are not presently germane.
So, at
the time of the Children of Israel’s (Abraham’s grandson’s) invasion of the
land, the Amorites had become as corrupt and irredeemable as they could be.
So,
what was the nature of their corruption?
There is no specific history of the account of their corruption
mentioned in the Bible, however, after much time had passed, the kingdom of the
Children of Israel who had wrenched the land from the Amorites became divided
into two separate kingdoms. In the
northern kingdom, there arose a king who became so evil and corrupt that he was
likened to the evil of Amorites (1Kings 21:26).
To understand the corruption of the Amorites, therefore, one need only
study the activities of that king whose name was Ahab. An account of the activity of Ahab and his
wife, Jezebel, can be found between chapter 16:29 and Chapter 22:40 of the book
of First Kings of the Bible. Among the
things they did was to construct Ashtaroth which were poles erected in honor of
the goddess Asherah. Mythology had it
that she was the consort of Baal… the weather god who rode the clouds and
carried lightning in his hand. The Ashtaroth
were constructed all over the northern kingdom of Israel and orgies were
conducted throughout the land in her honor since she was the pagan “goddess of
fertility”. Their idolatry led Ahab and
Jezebel to murder the actual prophets of God.
Furthermore, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were running rampant
throughout the land drastically lowering the life expectancy among the population. Not too soon after
Ahab’s reign, the northern kingdom of Israel was taken into captivity by the Assyrians
and sent into exile. As bad as Ahab was,
that’s how bad the Amorites had become by the time the Children of Israel had
left Egypt. That’s why God wanted to use
Israel to wipe them out completely.
They’d become a cesspool of sex, idolatry, lawlessness and murder.
Concerning
the Amorites, in Exodus 23:32-33 God tells Israel
“You shall make no
covenant with them or with their gods.
They shall not live in your land, because they will make you sin against
Me; for if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you”
God
wanted the Amorites gone because they were thoroughly nonredeemable, and their
idolatry and practices of prostitution would only serve to tempt the Children
of Israel to immorality.
B.
The purposes behind why
God wanted the Children of Israel to inhabit the land.
Rather
obviously King Ahab of the northern kingdom of Israel was not the way God
desired for the kingdom of Israel to progress.
God had given a law known as the Torah to the Children of Israel. It was an amazing law which made supernatural
demands upon the people of Israel.
To
illustrate just how amazing this law was, one of its statutes stated the
following:
If you meet your enemy’s
ox or his donkey wandering away, you shall surely return it to him. If you see the donkey of one who hates you
lying helpless under its load, you shall refrain from leaving it to him, you
shall surely release it with him.
Exodus 23:4-5
This
was a practice that was unheard of and still is unheard of to this day! Whoever heard of a man acting charitably
towards his enemy? When Israel, after
having been exiled and returned to the land, under Roman domination, Jesus told
the people of His day just about the very same thing…
“But I say to you, do not
resist an evil person; but whoever slaps
you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.”
Matthew 5:39
The
point that I’m making is that much of the Law of God consisted of decrees that
were outside of human nature to carry out.
Man, in his natural state is not going to “turn the other cheek”. A unique, special sort of motivation is
needed to implement this law on a personal level. Certainly, in the case of the above law,
willful forgiveness is required as well as renunciation of pride and the taking
on of humility when one has been dishonored.
Essentially, one must be willing to love God so much that he is willing
put his own self-interests aside in deference to God’s law. And God’s law is
spelled out only in God’s word, the Bible.
Human
nature says “I can be a good person, in fact, I AM a good person”. And so, God gave the Children of Israel an
opportunity to try to implement His law.
Of course, this law could never be implemented to perfection, but
imagine that you’ve been told to shoot an arrow at a target. How are you even going to get near the target
if you don’t know what direction that the target is in? The law pointed in the direction, and the
objective was to create a society, which, governed by the perfect Law of God,
consisted of a population of people who were, at least compared to all the
nations around them, compassionate and respectful towards one another. Disputes were to be settled justly and in an
orderly fashion. Yes, some punishments
were treated with the utmost of severity but the intent was that such
punishments would never even be necessary.
So
exactly where was this land where this “society” was to be established? In Genesis 15:18, while God was making His
aforementioned covenant with Abraham, He tells him.
“To your descendants, I have given this
land.
From the river of Egypt as far as the great
river, the river Euphrates”
The land was to
extend from the eastern most river of the Nile Delta to the Euphrates
River. This promise is reiterated not to
Ishmael, Abraham’s oldest son through a servant woman, but to Abraham’s other
son, Isaac (the son born supernaturally of Sarah who was considered by all
standards, too old to have children) in Genesis 26:2-5. The promise is again,
repeated not to Isaac’s son, Esau, but to Isaac’s son Jacob in Genesis
23:13-15.
The descendants
of Jacob have never fully acquired all this land, but the God of the Bible, who
will not lie, promises that one day they will obtain all of it. In Leviticus 26:40-45 Moses tells us that the
descendants of Jacob (who is also called Israel) will be exiled from the land
but would one day return from the four corners of the earth.
But why this
particular parcel of land?
The land was to
be located right in the middle of the trading routes as caravans took their
goods from East to West and North to South and vice versa, all over the known
world.
Now imagine if
you will… this land, right in the middle of these trading routes is inhabited
by a people who, because they love God, can do extraordinary things like
displaying acts of kindness towards even their enemies. The traders would marvel and attribute this
amazing relationship between these people to their God. They would go back to their homes and
families after their long journeys and tell their wives and children about this
marvelous God. People all over the world
would give up their idols and pursue the knowledge of this wonderful God.
Obviously as
we’d looked at Ahab, this experiment failed.
The kingdom had been divided in two and the northern kingdom was
destroyed by the Assyrians. The southern
kingdom of Judah was taken captive by the Babylonians about 150 years later,
also because of their sin. There’s a
saying that “Jewish people are just like everyone else only more so”. The Jewish people failed because, when it
comes to righteousness, it’s human nature to fail. Why do we get angry when we’re insulted or
dishonored? All of us is prone to hate
our enemies. But the law demands that
we’re to act otherwise.
But there was
one other reason for this law that I’d like to suggest. A descendant among these people was going to
be born who would be the very embodiment of this law. He was to be the perfect person who was to
demonstrate righteousness, show man “how it’s done” as it were and, contrary to
the declarations of Moses and the Prophets, face death.
It’s written:
Behold, all souls are Mine; the soul of the
father as well as the soul of the son is mine.
The soul that sins will die.
Ezekiel 18:4
Ezekiel said
that the one who sins is to face death.
But the Children of Israel were “pregnant” as it were with this perfect
person who was to come. His Name was
destined to be called Y’shua which means “The Salvation of God” (He’s commonly
known as Jesus or Isa). He never once
had an inappropriate thought or said an inappropriate word or did an inappropriate
deed. On the contrary, He miraculously
healed people and saw to their needs. It
was thoroughly inappropriate that He should face death but He did so willingly,
and was quick to forgive those who tortured Him, spoke ill of Him, insulted Him
and ultimately crucified Him.
C.
The nature of the warfare used in taking
the land
God said to the
Children of Israel through Moses…
“Behold, I am going to send an angel before
you to guard you along the way and to bring you into the place which I have
prepared. Be on your guard before him
and obey his voice; do not be rebellious toward him, for he will not pardon
your transgression, since My name is in him.
But if you truly obey his voice and do all that I say, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and
an adversary to your adversaries. For
My angel will go before you and bring you in to the land of the Amorites, the
Hittites, the Perizzites, the Canaanites, the hivites and the Jebusites; and I will completely destroy them.
(Exodus 23:20-24)
He goes on…
I will send My terror ahead of you, and
throw into confusion all the people among whom you come, and I will make all
your enemies turn their backs to you. I
will send hornets ahead of you so that they will drive out the Hivites, the Canaanites,
and the Hittites before you… You shall make no covenant with them or with their
gods. They shall not live in your land,
because they will make you sin against Me; for if you serve their gods, it will
surely be a snare to you.”
(Exodus 23:27-28. 32-33)
Put simply,
clearly from this text, God is doing the fighting on behalf of Israel to clear
the land of those nations whose idolatrous practices would pose as a snare to
them.
How then did
this “strategy” of the Angel of God going before the Children of Israel play
itself out?
The first city
that the Children of Israel came to was Jericho. Jericho.
Jericho was a large wall-enclosed city.
The city was taken because God Himself knocked down the walls. The people of Israel rushed in, killed
everyone except a prostitute who had repented of her prostitution and her
family. None of the Children of Israel
died.
The next battle
was at the town of Ai. There were two
attempts on the part of the Children of Israel to take the city. The first attempt was unsuccessful and 36 men
were killed. It turned out that this
lack of success was because one man had sinned.
That man and his family were put to death and the second attempt was
successful, again, without any Israelite casualties.
The third
battle was against five Amorite kings.
We read about this battle in the Book of Joshua, chapter 10. In this battle, God routed the Amorites,
literally killing more Amorites than the Children of Israel did by creating a
giant hail storm.
Essentially,
when God is fighting for Israel, if there is no sin in the Israelite camp, no
Israelite dies. Furthermore, it is God
Himself, who does most of the killing.
Let’s bring us
now to the 21st century.
We’ve noted that, at least per the Bible, Moses (as well as the other
prophets) had foretold that the people of Israel would be scattered,
understandably because of their sin.
We’re also told that they would eventually return to the land. We’ve also learned that the land they presently
occupy is only a fraction of the land that had been initially promised to them
by God, through their ancestors Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
We’ve also
learned that as cruel as the Biblical call to genocide of the inhabitants of
the land seemed to be, it was justified not only because of the utter depravity
of those people present in the land but the land needed to be cleared so as to establish a witness to what a righteous nation looked like. and even though the Children of Israel failed as an example, they were carrying in their midst, the "seed" that was to be the perfect example of humanity... the Messiah Y'shua. Furthermore evidence for that justification was manifest by God
Himself as it was He who was doing most of the fighting.
We’ve also
noted that when there is absolutely no sin, no one on the side of Israel dies.
Today, the
people of Israel are back in the land.
Is this the time of their return?
Maybe yes… maybe no. We do know
however, that when the State of Israel was first formed, five well-equipped and
trained Arab armies fought against a rag-tag force of a few thousand, ill-armed
holocaust survivors and were rebuffed.
One web-site, gives figures for the deaths of Arabs vs.
Israelis between the years 1948 and 1973.
Just counting the deaths of the specific wars during those years there
were an estimated 6,800 to 11,100 Israeli deaths and 35,800 to 68,600 Arab
deaths, every one of which was tragic!
Even the wars and intifadas after this time have led to more Arab deaths
than Jewish deaths. Considering this
data, what evidence is there that miracles were performed by Allah on behalf of
the Muslim cause? Where has Allah shown
signs that he was fighting for Islam? In
contrast, anecdotes abound of instances where God has fought in this modern era
on behalf of the Israelis. One need only
conduct a Google search.
Of course,
Muhammad encouraged fighters to be willing to “die for the cause of Allah”. However, the Biblical model that I’ve put
forth seems to intimate that the army that is without sin suffers absolutely no
losses. Considering that, it seems that
there is plenty of sin to go around. The
sad thing is that people tend to be too arrogant either to admit their sin or
to question the world view that drives them on to mutual destruction.
I would pose
the question, therefore… “Is Islam a ‘religion of peace’s or is it in fact, a
world view founded by a pseudo prophet, that is fighting against the will of
the one and only true God? I would also
pose the question. ‘what makes Muslims
so sure that Jesus is merely just a prophet and what makes Jews so sure that
Jesus is not the Messiah?
I hold as axiomatic that
these two factions are fundamentally at war with each other because they each reject an understanding of just who Jesus is.
No comments:
Post a Comment